4 February 2016 

The financial crisis that erupted in the eurozone not only affected the EU’s financial governance mechanisms, but also the very nature of state sovereignty and balances in the relations of member states; thus, the actual inequalities between the member states hidden behind their institutional equality have deteriorated. This transformation is recorded in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the member states’ constitutional courts, particularly in those at the heart of the crisis, with Greece as the most prominent example.

It is the issue of public debt (sovereign debt) of the EU member states that particularly reflects the influence of the crisis on state sovereignty as well as the intensely transnational (intergovernmental) character of European integration, which under these circumstances takes the form of a continuous, tough negotiation. The historical connection between public debt (sovereign debt) and state sovereignty has re-emerged because of the financial crisis. This development has affected not only the European institutions, but also, at the member state level, the actual institutional content of the rule of law (especially judicial review) and the welfare state in its essence, as the great social and political acquis of 20th century Europe. From this perspective, the way that the Greek courts have dealt with the gradual waves of fiscal austerity measures and structural reforms from 2010 to 2015 is characteristic. The effect of the financial crisis on the sovereignty of the member states and on the pace of European integration also has an impact on European foreign and security policy, and the correlations between the political forces at both the national and European level, thus producing even more intense pressures on European social democracy. In light of the experience of the financial crisis, the final question is whether the nation state (given the large real inequalities among the EU member states) currently functions as a brake or as an engine for future European integration.

Download the publication: 


Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 51, 2002, σελ. 515-536

  • Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, Neue Folge/ Band 51, Mohr Siebeck, 2003, σελ. 513-530 
  • European Review of Public Law / Revue Européenne de Droit Public 13.4, winter 2001, σελ. 1291-1316

G. Dimitrakopoulos & G. Kremlis (eds), A New Constitutional Settlement for the European People, Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2004. pp. 33-47

G. Amato, G. Braibant. E. Venizelos (επιμ.), The Constitutional Revision in Today’s Europe, Esperia Publications, Λονδίνο, 2002, 30 επ., σελ. 25-39

[The political party in the age of globalisation – The perspective of the open party] 

D. Tsatsos, E. Venizelos & X. Contiades (επιμ.), Political Parties in the 21st Century, Bruylant & Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2004

 P. Häberle, M. Morlok & V. Skouris (επιμ.), Festschrift für Dimitris Th. Tsatsos, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2003, σελ. 690-702

Revue Européenne de Droit Public, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 2004, pp. 19-32 

Revue Européenne de Droit Public, Vol. 17, 2005.1, pp. 691-706